Joseph Fourier's father was a tailor in Auxerre. After
the death of his first wife, with whom he had three children, he remarried and
Joseph was the ninth of the twelve children of this second marriage. Joseph's
mother died went he was nine years old and his father died the following year.

His first schooling was at Pallais's school, run by
the music master from the cathedral. There Joseph studied Latin and French and
showed great promise. He proceeded in 1780 to the École Royale Militaire
of Auxerre where at first he showed talents for literature but very soon, by
the age of thirteen, mathematics became his real interest. By the age of 14 he
had completed a study of the six volumes of
Bézout's Cours de mathematique. In 1783 he received the first
prize for his study of Bossut's
Méchanique en général.

In 1787 Fourier decided to train for the priesthood
and entered the Benedictine abbey of St Benoit-sur-Loire. His interest in
mathematics continued, however, and he corresponded with C L Bonard, the
professor of mathematics at Auxerre. Fourier was unsure if he was making the
right decision in training for the priesthood. He submitted a paper on algebra
to Montucla in Paris and his letters to
Bonard suggest that he really wanted to make a major impact in mathematics. In
one letter Fourier wrote

Yesterday was my 21st birthday, at that age Newton and
Pascal had already acquired many claims to immortality.

Fourier did not take his religious vows. Having left
St Benoit in 1789, he visited Paris and read a paper on algebraic equations at
the Académie Royale des Sciences. In 1790 he became a teacher at the
Benedictine college, École Royale Militaire of Auxerre, where he had
studied. Up until this time there had been a conflict inside Fourier about whether
he should follow a religious life or one of mathematical research. However in
1793 a third element was added to this conflict when he became involved in
politics and joined the local Revolutionary Committee. As he wrote:-

As the natural ideas of equality developed it was
possible to conceive the sublime hope of establishing among us a free
government exempt from kings and priests, and to free from this double yoke the
long-usurped soil of Europe. I readily became enamoured of this cause, in my
opinion the greatest and most beautiful which any nation has ever undertaken.

Certainly Fourier was unhappy about the Terror which
resulted from the French Revolution and he attempted to resign from the
committee. However this proved impossible and Fourier was now firmly entangled
with the Revolution and unable to withdraw. The revolution was a complicated
affair with many factions, with broadly similar aims, violently opposed to each
other. Fourier defended members of one faction while in Orléans. A
letter describing events relates:-

Citizen Fourier, a young man full of intelligence,
eloquence and zeal, was sent to Loiret. ... It seems that Fourier ... got up on
certain popular platforms. He can talk very well and if he put forward the
views of the Society of Auxerre he has done nothing blameworthy...

This incident was to have serious consequences but
after it Fourier returned to Auxerre and continued to work on the revolutionary
committee and continued to teach at the College. In July 1794 he was arrested,
the charges relating to the Orléans incident, and he was imprisoned.
Fourier feared the he would go to the guillotine but, after Robespierre himself
went to the guillotine, political changes resulted in Fourier being freed.

Later in 1794 Fourier was nominated to study at the
École Normale in Paris. This institution had been set up for training
teachers and it was intended to serve as a model for other teacher-training
schools. The school opened in January 1795 and Fourier was certainly the most
able of the pupils whose abilities ranged widely. He was taught by Lagrange, who Fourier described as

the first among European men of science,

and also by
Laplace, who Fourier rated less highly, and by Monge who Fourier described as

having a loud voice and is active, ingenious and very
learned.

Fourier began teaching at the Collège de France
and, having excellent relations with
Lagrange, Laplace and Monge, began further mathematical research.
He was appointed to a position at the École Centrale des Travaux
Publiques, the school being under the direction of Lazare Carnot and Gaspard Monge, which was soon to be renamed École Polytechnique.
However, repercussions of his earlier arrest remained and he was arrested again
imprisoned. His release has been put down to a variety of different causes,
pleas by his pupils, pleas by
Lagrange, Laplace or Monge or a change in the political climate.
In fact all three may have played a part.

By 1 September 1795 Fourier was back teaching at the
École Polytechnique. In 1797 he succeeded Lagrange in being appointed to the chair of analysis and
mechanics. He was renowned as an outstanding lecturer but he does not appear to
have undertaken original research during this time.

In 1798 Fourier joined Napoleon's army in its invasion
of Egypt as scientific adviser. Monge
and Malus were also part of the
expeditionary force. The expedition was at first a great success. Malta was
occupied on 10 June 1798, Alexandria taken by storm on 1 July, and the delta of
the Nile quickly taken. However, on 1 August 1798 the French fleet was
completely destroyed by Nelson's fleet in the Battle of the Nile, so that
Napoleon found himself confined to the land that he was occupying. Fourier
acted as an administrator as French type political institutions and administration
was set up. In particular he helped establish educational facilities in Egypt
and carried out archaeological explorations.

While in Cairo Fourier helped found the Cairo
Institute and was one of the twelve members of the mathematics division, the others
included Monge, Malus and Napoleon Bonaparte. Fourier was
elected secretary to the Institute, a position he continued to hold during the
entire French occupation of Egypt. Fourier was also put in charge of collating
the scientific and literary discoveries made during the time in Egypt.

Napoleon abandoned his army and returned to Paris in
1799, he soon held absolute power in France. Fourier returned to France in 1801
with the remains of the expeditionary force and resumed his post as Professor
of Analysis at the École Polytechnique. However Napoleon had other ideas
about how Fourier might serve him and wrote:-

... the Prefect of the Department of Isère
having recently died, I would like to express my confidence in citizen Fourier
by appointing him to this place.

Fourier was not happy at the prospect of leaving the
academic world and Paris but could not refuse Napoleon's request. He went to
Grenoble where his duties as Prefect were many and varied. His two greatest
achievements in this administrative position was overseeing the operation to
drain the swamps of Bourgoin and to oversee the construction of a new highway
from Grenoble to Turin. He also spent much time working on the Description of
Egypt which was not completed until 1810 when Napoleon made changes, rewriting
history in places, to it before publication. By the time a second edition
appeared every reference to Napoleon would have been removed.

It was during his time in Grenoble that Fourier did
his important mathematical work on the theory of heat. His work on the topic
began around 1804 and by 1807 he had completed his important memoir On the
Propagation of Heat in Solid Bodies. The memoir was read to the Paris Institute
on 21 December 1807 and a committee consisting of Lagrange, Laplace, Monge and
Lacroix was set up to report on the work. Now this memoir is very highly
regarded but at the time it caused controversy.

There were two reasons for the committee to feel
unhappy with the work. The first objection, made by Lagrange and Laplace in
1808, was to Fourier's expansions of functions as trigonometrical series, what
we now call Fourier series. Further clarification by Fourier still failed to
convince them. As is pointed out in:-

All these are written with such exemplary clarity -
from a logical as opposed to calligraphic point of view - that their inability
to persuade Laplace and Lagrange ... provides a good index of the
originality of Fourier's views.

The second objection was made by Biot against Fourier's derivation of the
equations of transfer of heat. Fourier had not made reference to Biot's 1804 paper on this topic but Biot's paper is certainly incorrect. Laplace, and later Poisson, had similar objections.

The Institute set as a prize competition subject the
propagation of heat in solid bodies for the 1811 mathematics prize. Fourier
submitted his 1807 memoir together with additional work on the cooling of
infinite solids and terrestrial and radiant heat. Only one other entry was
received and the committee set up to decide on the award of the prize, Lagrange,
Laplace, Malus, Haüy
and Legendre, awarded Fourier the
prize. The report was not however completely favourable and states:-

... the manner in which the author arrives at these
equations is not exempt of difficulties and that his analysis to integrate them
still leaves something to be desired on the score of generality and even
rigour.

With this rather mixed report there was no move in
Paris to publish Fourier's work.

When Napoleon was defeated and on his way to exile in
Elba, his route should have been through Grenoble. Fourier managed to avoid
this difficult confrontation by sending word that it would be dangerous for
Napoleon. When he learnt of Napoleon's escape from Elba and that he was
marching towards Grenoble with an army, Fourier was extremely worried. He tried
to persuade the people of Grenoble to oppose Napoleon and give their allegiance
to the King. However as Napoleon marched into the town Fourier left in haste.

Napoleon was angry with Fourier who he had hoped would
welcome his return. Fourier was able to talk his way into favour with both
sides and Napoleon made him Prefect of the Rhône. However Fourier soon
resigned on receiving orders, possibly from
Carnot, that the was to remove all administrators with royalist
sympathies. He could not have completely fallen out with Napoleon and Carnot, however, for on 10 June 1815,
Napoleon awarded him a pension of 6000 francs, payable from 1 July. However
Napoleon was defeated on 1 July and Fourier did not receive any money. He
returned to Paris.

Fourier was elected to the Académie des
Sciences in 1817. In 1822 Delambre, who
was the Secretary to the mathematical section of the Académie des
Sciences, died and Fourier together with
Biot and Arago applied for the
post. After Arago withdrew the election
gave Fourier an easy win. Shortly after Fourier became Secretary, the Academy
published his prize winning essay Théorie analytique de la chaleur in
1822. This was not a piece of political manoeuvring by Fourier however
since Delambre had arranged for the
printing before he died.

During Fourier's eight last years in Paris he resumed
his mathematical researches and published a number of papers, some in pure
mathematics while some were on applied mathematical topics. His life was not
without problems however since his theory of heat still provoked
controversy. Biot claimed priority over
Fourier, a claim which Fourier had little difficulty showing to be false.
Poisson, however, attacked both Fourier's mathematical techniques and also
claimed to have an alternative theory. Fourier wrote Historical Précis
as a reply to these claims but, although the work was shown to various mathematicians,
it was never published.

Fourier's views on the claims of Biot and
Poisson are given in the following, see:-

Having contested the various results [ Biot and Poisson] now recognise that they are exact
but they protest that they have invented another method of expounding them and
that this method is excellent and the true one. If they had illuminated this
branch of physics by important and general views and had greatly perfected the
analysis of partial differential
equations, if they had established a principal element of the theory of heat by
fine experiments ... they would have the right to judge my work and to correct
it. I would submit with much pleasure .. But one does not extend the bounds of
science by presenting, in a form said to be different, results which one has
not found oneself and, above all, by forestalling the true author in
publication.

Fourier's work provided the impetus for later work on
trigonometric series and the theory of functions of a real variable.

J J O'Connor and E F Robertson

Список
литературы

Для подготовки
данной работы были использованы материалы с сайта http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/